Template:Controversial
 | The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
File:Test Template Info-Icon - Version (2).svg Template documentation[view] [edit] [history] [purge]
Usage
No description.
| Parameter | Description | Type | Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| small | small | no description | Unknown | optional |
| category | category | no description | Unknown | optional |
This template will categorise articles into Category:Controversial topics. To use this template, add {{Controversial|date=November 2026}} to an article’s talk page.
See also
Policy/Guideline pages
- BattleIntelligence:Accuracy dispute
- BattleIntelligence:Consensus
- BattleIntelligence:Dispute resolution
- BattleIntelligence:Disputed statement
- BattleIntelligence:Neutral point of view
- BattleIntelligence:Template messages
- BattleIntelligence:Template namespace
Templates
Disputed factual accuracy
- Boxes:
- {{Disputed}} For disputing entire article
- {{Disputed section}} For disputing a section in an article
- {{Disputed tag}} For disputing recent promotions or amendments of policies and guidelines
- {{Under discussion}} For use on project pages (e.g., policies and guidelines), not on articles
- Inline:
- {{Dubious}}, and {{Disputed inline}} Statement
- {{Under discussion inline}} Statements on project pages
Both accuracy and POV
- Boxes:
- {{Controversial}} Talk page
Disputed neutrality (POV)
- Boxes:
- {{POV}} Article,
- {{POV section}} Section
- Inline:
- {{POV statement}} Statement
.svg){kind=link}