Policy Talk:What BattleIntelligence is not

Not a fan

I am not altogether sure if we need a "negative" page like this. It feels a little bit off-putting, and the target audience isn’t going to read it anyways. So its actual purpose seems to be to cite it to editors who overstepped.

Regarding content, I feel it is way too vague to be useful. It also seems to directly contradict our "All things BattleTech" mission statement on Sarna. Some trivia may not meet the standards for notability - but that would be the exception, not the rule. Frabby (talk) 02:30, 19 November 2024 (EST)

Whilst I kinda agree with you, at the same time we have a bunch of "unspoken rules" on the wiki such as video game articles purposefully avoiding being "game guides" and featuring stuff like gameplay tips or detailed information about how the game mechanics work, I do not believe we have that written down anywhere, so this just actually does that.--Dmon (talk) 04:37, 19 November 2024 (EST)

I think we take a lot of these rules/guidelines for granted being longtime editors, who communicate with each other regularly to work on projects and troubleshoot issues that come up. When unregistered IPs or new members add new content, a lot of times it goes against the direction we're trying to move Sarna in. Some of the stuff in this page needs to be said, and if not here then somewhere else very easy for new users to find. Csdavis715 (talk) 08:50, 19 November 2024 (EST)