Policy:Ownership of content: Difference between revisions
imported>Deadfire m adding list template |
Tungstenchan (talk | contribs) m Text replacement - "BattleTechWiki" to "BattleIntelligence" |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<noinclude>{{pp-move-indef}}</noinclude> | <noinclude>{{pp-move-indef}}</noinclude> | ||
{{Redirect|BTW:OWN|the guideline about users' own talk pages and the removal of posts and comments|BTW:OWNTALK}} | {{Redirect|BTW:OWN|the guideline about users' own talk pages and the removal of posts and comments|BTW:OWNTALK}} | ||
{{About|control over an article's text|the ownership of copyright in an article| | {{About|control over an article's text|the ownership of copyright in an article|BattleIntelligence:Copyrights}} | ||
{{proposal|BTW:OWN}} | {{proposal|BTW:OWN}} | ||
{{nutshell| | {{nutshell|BattleIntelligence content is collaboratively edited, and no one "owns" any part of it. All editors must respect contributions from others, work towards consensus, and resolve disputes civilly.}} | ||
{{Conduct policy list}} | {{Conduct policy list}} | ||
== Overview == | == Overview == | ||
All articles and pages on '' | All articles and pages on ''BattleIntelligence'' are collaboratively created and edited by the community. As such, '''no single individual or group owns any content'''. This policy ensures a neutral, inclusive, and dynamic online wiki project. As each edit page clearly states: {{quote|'''Please note that all contributions to BattleIntelligence are considered to be released under the GNU FDL 1.2 (see BattleIntelligence:Copyrights for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.'''}} | ||
This means by contributing to | This means by contributing to BattleIntelligence, you acknowledge: | ||
* Other editors may freely edit, modify, or expand your contributions. | * Other editors may freely edit, modify, or expand your contributions. | ||
* You cannot prevent others from editing or undoing your changes unless it violates policy or consensus. | * You cannot prevent others from editing or undoing your changes unless it violates policy or consensus. | ||
* Content disputes should be addressed through [[ | * Content disputes should be addressed through [[BattleIntelligence:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]] mechanisms. | ||
== Key Principles == | == Key Principles == | ||
* '''No Ownership of Content:''' No editor has exclusive rights to any content, regardless of their level of contribution. | * '''No Ownership of Content:''' No editor has exclusive rights to any content, regardless of their level of contribution. | ||
* '''Respect for Collaboration:''' Engage respectfully with others, especially when challenging their edits or suggesting changes. | * '''Respect for Collaboration:''' Engage respectfully with others, especially when challenging their edits or suggesting changes. | ||
* '''Neutrality and Verifiability:''' Ensure all contributions adhere to the principles of [[ | * '''Neutrality and Verifiability:''' Ensure all contributions adhere to the principles of [[BattleIntelligence:Neutral point of view|neutrality]] and [[BattleIntelligence:Verifiability|verifiability]]. | ||
== Stewardship vs. Ownership == | == Stewardship vs. Ownership == | ||
Editors with a strong interest, expertise, or involvement in a topic may take on a role of stewardship for an article or group of related articles. Stewardship involves maintaining the quality, accuracy, and neutrality of content while collaborating constructively with others. However, '''stewardship must not cross into ownership'''. | Editors with a strong interest, expertise, or involvement in a topic may take on a role of stewardship for an article or group of related articles. Stewardship involves maintaining the quality, accuracy, and neutrality of content while collaborating constructively with others. However, '''stewardship must not cross into ownership'''. | ||
[[ | [[BattleIntelligence:Masthead|Senior Editors]], are the BattleIntelligence's recognized role for "stewards" for certain wiki "subjects", and can be the primary contact for any questions about a certain subject's content. This role carries with it the expectation of Stewardship in all aspects. | ||
=== Characteristics of Stewardship === | === Characteristics of Stewardship === | ||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
* Provides expertise and guidance to improve content. | * Provides expertise and guidance to improve content. | ||
* Actively engages with other editors to achieve consensus. | * Actively engages with other editors to achieve consensus. | ||
* Refers to [[ | * Refers to [[BattleIntelligence:Policies and guidelines|policies and guidelines]] when making changes. | ||
* Welcomes contributions from all editors and fosters collaboration. | * Welcomes contributions from all editors and fosters collaboration. | ||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
For editors acting as stewards: | For editors acting as stewards: | ||
* '''Engage Others''': Use the article’s talk page to explain your reasoning and invite feedback. | * '''Engage Others''': Use the article’s talk page to explain your reasoning and invite feedback. | ||
* '''Cite Policies''': Reference [[ | * '''Cite Policies''': Reference [[BattleIntelligence:Neutral point of view|neutrality]], [[BattleIntelligence:Verifiability|verifiability]], and other relevant guidelines to support your stance. | ||
* '''Avoid Dominance''': Ensure that all contributors feel their input is valued and considered. | * '''Avoid Dominance''': Ensure that all contributors feel their input is valued and considered. | ||
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
* Consistently rejects others’ contributions without valid reasons. | * Consistently rejects others’ contributions without valid reasons. | ||
* Acts as a gatekeeper, requiring approval for changes to an article. | * Acts as a gatekeeper, requiring approval for changes to an article. | ||
* Engages in [[ | * Engages in [[BattleIntelligence:Edit warring|edit wars]] to enforce their version of content. | ||
* Uses their role as a steward to marginalize or discredit other contributors. | * Uses their role as a steward to marginalize or discredit other contributors. | ||
| Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
* Address the issue on the article’s talk page. | * Address the issue on the article’s talk page. | ||
* Encourage collaborative discussions rather than confrontations. | * Encourage collaborative discussions rather than confrontations. | ||
* Use [[ | * Use [[BattleIntelligence:Resolving disputes|dispute resolution]] if necessary. | ||
=== Stewardship and Complex Articles === | === Stewardship and Complex Articles === | ||
In cases where an article involves highly specialized or complex content, stewardship can be particularly valuable. [[ | In cases where an article involves highly specialized or complex content, stewardship can be particularly valuable. [[BattleIntelligence:Masthead|Senior Editors]], as BattleIntelligence's form of recognized "stewards" can help locate [[BattleIntelligence:Identifying reliable sources|reliable sources]], structure content effectively, and ensure compliance with community standards. However, expertise does not override the collaborative nature of BattleIntelligence. Stewards must remain open to others’ perspectives and avoid the temptation to act as the sole authority. Stewardship is a responsibility, not a privilege. It is rooted in collaboration and respect for the community's collective effort. | ||
== User Pages and Talk Pages == | == User Pages and Talk Pages == | ||
Although users have broad discretion over their own [[ | Although users have broad discretion over their own [[BattleIntelligence:User pages|user pages]], these are part of the wiki and subject to the same collaborative principles, policies, and guidelines. | ||
== See Also == | == See Also == | ||
* [[ | * [[BattleIntelligence:Copyrights]] | ||
* [[ | * [[BattleIntelligence:Dispute resolution]] | ||
* [[ | * [[BattleIntelligence:Civility]] | ||
* [[ | * [[BattleIntelligence:Consensus]] | ||
{{ | {{BattleIntelligence policies and guidelines}} | ||
[[Category: | [[Category:BattleIntelligence culture]] | ||
Latest revision as of 22:43, 30 April 2025
The following is a proposed BattleIntelligence policy, guideline, or process. The proposal may still be in development, under discussion, or in the process of gathering consensus for adoption. |
This page in a nutshell: BattleIntelligence content is collaboratively edited, and no one "owns" any part of it. All editors must respect contributions from others, work towards consensus, and resolve disputes civilly. |
Overview
All articles and pages on BattleIntelligence are collaboratively created and edited by the community. As such, no single individual or group owns any content. This policy ensures a neutral, inclusive, and dynamic online wiki project. As each edit page clearly states:
| “ | Please note that all contributions to BattleIntelligence are considered to be released under the GNU FDL 1.2 (see BattleIntelligence:Copyrights for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here. | ” |
This means by contributing to BattleIntelligence, you acknowledge:
- Other editors may freely edit, modify, or expand your contributions.
- You cannot prevent others from editing or undoing your changes unless it violates policy or consensus.
- Content disputes should be addressed through dispute resolution mechanisms.
Key Principles
- No Ownership of Content: No editor has exclusive rights to any content, regardless of their level of contribution.
- Respect for Collaboration: Engage respectfully with others, especially when challenging their edits or suggesting changes.
- Neutrality and Verifiability: Ensure all contributions adhere to the principles of neutrality and verifiability.
Stewardship vs. Ownership
Editors with a strong interest, expertise, or involvement in a topic may take on a role of stewardship for an article or group of related articles. Stewardship involves maintaining the quality, accuracy, and neutrality of content while collaborating constructively with others. However, stewardship must not cross into ownership.
Senior Editors, are the BattleIntelligence's recognized role for "stewards" for certain wiki "subjects", and can be the primary contact for any questions about a certain subject's content. This role carries with it the expectation of Stewardship in all aspects.
Characteristics of Stewardship
Stewardship is a positive and constructive role that benefits the wiki, as long as the editor remains open to feedback and adheres to community standards. A steward:
- Provides expertise and guidance to improve content.
- Actively engages with other editors to achieve consensus.
- Refers to policies and guidelines when making changes.
- Welcomes contributions from all editors and fosters collaboration.
Transitioning Stewardship into Collaboration
For editors acting as stewards:
- Engage Others: Use the article’s talk page to explain your reasoning and invite feedback.
- Cite Policies: Reference neutrality, verifiability, and other relevant guidelines to support your stance.
- Avoid Dominance: Ensure that all contributors feel their input is valued and considered.
Characteristics of Ownership
Ownership behavior may emerge when an editor:
- Consistently rejects others’ contributions without valid reasons.
- Acts as a gatekeeper, requiring approval for changes to an article.
- Engages in edit wars to enforce their version of content.
- Uses their role as a steward to marginalize or discredit other contributors.
Transitioning Ownership into Collaboration
If behavior starts to resemble ownership, other editors should:
- Address the issue on the article’s talk page.
- Encourage collaborative discussions rather than confrontations.
- Use dispute resolution if necessary.
Stewardship and Complex Articles
In cases where an article involves highly specialized or complex content, stewardship can be particularly valuable. Senior Editors, as BattleIntelligence's form of recognized "stewards" can help locate reliable sources, structure content effectively, and ensure compliance with community standards. However, expertise does not override the collaborative nature of BattleIntelligence. Stewards must remain open to others’ perspectives and avoid the temptation to act as the sole authority. Stewardship is a responsibility, not a privilege. It is rooted in collaboration and respect for the community's collective effort.
User Pages and Talk Pages
Although users have broad discretion over their own user pages, these are part of the wiki and subject to the same collaborative principles, policies, and guidelines.